Background: Based on CD14/CD16 expression, monocytes can be divided into the following three functionally distinct subsets: classical (MO1, CD14++/CD16-), intermediate (MO2, CD14+/CD16+) and non-classical (MO3, CD14dim/CD16-). An expanded MO1 subset (cutoff, ≥94%) was found to be predictive of CMML. However, the utility of this test in routine practice has important limitations, with some reporting low sensitivity or a lack of correlation. Here, we sought to evaluate the practical usefulness of this test by using our routine antibody panel and a new gating strategy. Methods: Our study included 56 peripheral blood (PB) and 69 bone marrow (BM) samples. The PB cohort included 20 patients with CMML, 21 with no myeloid neoplasms (non-MN) and 15 with other myeloid neoplasms (non-CMML-MN). The BM cohort included 25 CMML, 16 non-MN and 28 non-CMML-MN cases. Taking advantage of an existing 8-color myelomonocytic tube routinely used in our lab, we conducted a retrospective monocyte subset analysis using a new sequential gating strategy. Results: The assay was able to distinguish CMML from non-CMML cases with high sensitivity (90.0%) and specificity (88.9%) in blood samples using a cutoff value of MO1 > 94%. For BM samples, a reduced MO3 < 1.24% was more closely associated with CMML with a sensitivity of 96.0% and a specificity of 79.5%. A side-by-side comparison of our assay with the original “monocyte assay” showed strong agreement. Conclusions: Our study demonstrates the utility of a practical and robust approach for monocyte subset analysis in the diagnosis of CMML.
背景:根据CD14/CD16的表达,单核细胞可分为以下三个功能不同的亚群:经典亚群(MO1,CD14++/CD16-)、中间亚群(MO2,CD14+/CD16+)和非经典亚群(MO3,CD14dim/CD16-)。既往研究发现,MO1亚群比例增高(截断值≥94%)对慢性粒-单核细胞白血病(CMML)具有预测价值。然而,该检测在常规实践中的应用存在重要局限性,有报道称其敏感性较低或缺乏相关性。本研究旨在通过采用本实验室常规抗体组合及新的设门策略,评估该检测的实际应用价值。方法:本研究纳入56例外周血样本和69例骨髓样本。外周血队列包括20例CMML患者、21例非髓系肿瘤患者及15例其他髓系肿瘤(非CMML-MN)患者。骨髓队列包括25例CMML、16例非MN及28例非CMML-MN病例。利用本实验室常规使用的8色髓系-单核细胞检测方案,采用新的序列设门策略进行回顾性单核细胞亚群分析。结果:在外周血样本中,以MO1 > 94%为截断值,该检测能以高敏感性(90.0%)和高特异性(88.9%)区分CMML与非CMML病例。对于骨髓样本,MO3 < 1.24%与CMML的相关性更强,敏感性达96.0%,特异性为79.5%。将本检测方法与原始"单核细胞检测法"进行平行比较,结果显示两者具有高度一致性。结论:本研究证明,采用实用且稳健的单核细胞亚群分析方法对CMML诊断具有重要价值。