肿瘤(癌症)患者之家
首页
癌症知识
肿瘤中医药治疗
肿瘤药膳
肿瘤治疗技术
前沿资讯
临床试验招募
登录/注册
VIP特权
广告
广告加载中...

文章:

前瞻性、随机、比较性研究:氟达拉滨/白消安与氟达拉滨/白消安/全身照射预处理方案在髓系疾病中的对比分析

Prospective, Randomized, Comparative Study of Myeloablative Fludarabine/Busulfan and Fludarabine/Busulfan/Total Body Irradiation Conditioning in Myeloid Diseases

原文发布日期:28 March 2025

DOI: 10.3390/cancers17071140

类型: Article

开放获取: 是

 

英文摘要:

Background/Objectives: Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) is a curative treatment for myeloid diseases, yet relapse remains the major cause of post-transplant mortality. To reduce the risk of recurrence, we evaluated the addition of 400 cGy total body irradiation (TBI) to conditioning with fludarabine-busulfan (Flu/Bu4).Methods: In this prospective study, 46 patients with myeloid diseases were randomized to Flu/Bu4 or Flu/Bu4/TBI conditioning group. The Flu/Bu4 conditioning regimen consisted of fludarabine 40 mg/m2on days -6 to -3 followed by busulfan 130 mg/m2on days -6 to -3. Flu/Bu4/TBI conditioning regimen added 400 cGy TBI on day -1 to the FluBu4 regimen.Results: Among 34 acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients, relapse was numerically lower in those who received Flu/Bu4/TBI (25%) versus Flu/Bu4 (44.4%) at three years (HR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.19 to 1.81,p= 0.35). Flu/Bu4/TBI appeared to increase the risk of non-relapse mortality (NRM) vs. Flu/Bu4 in AML patients at three years (25.0% versus 11.1%; HR = 2.11, 95% CI 0.51 to 8.83,p= 0.65). Overall survival (OS) was similar in AML patients undergoing conditioning with Flu/Bu4 (72.2%) versus Flu/Bu4/TBI (62.5%) at one year (p= 0.4).Conclusions: In conclusion, the addition of 400 cGy TBI to Flu/Bu4 reduced the risk of relapse but did not improve OS as a consequence of higher regimen-related mortality. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT01366612.

 

摘要翻译: 

背景/目的:异基因造血干细胞移植(alloSCT)是治疗髓系疾病的有效方法,但复发仍是移植后死亡的主要原因。为降低复发风险,本研究评估在氟达拉滨-白消安(Flu/Bu4)预处理方案基础上联合400 cGy全身照射(TBI)的效果。 方法:在这项前瞻性研究中,46例髓系疾病患者被随机分配至Flu/Bu4预处理组或Flu/Bu4/TBI预处理组。Flu/Bu4预处理方案为:第-6至-3天给予氟达拉滨40 mg/m²,随后在第-6至-3天给予白消安130 mg/m²。Flu/Bu4/TBI预处理方案则在Flu/Bu4方案基础上,于第-1天加用400 cGy TBI。 结果:在34例急性髓系白血病(AML)患者中,接受Flu/Bu4/TBI预处理的患者三年复发率(25%)较Flu/Bu4组(44.4%)呈降低趋势(HR=0.58,95% CI 0.19-1.81,p=0.35)。但Flu/Bu4/TBI方案可能增加AML患者三年非复发死亡率(NRM)(25.0% vs 11.1%;HR=2.11,95% CI 0.51-8.83,p=0.65)。两组AML患者一年总生存率(OS)相近:Flu/Bu4组72.2% vs Flu/Bu4/TBI组62.5%(p=0.4)。 结论:在Flu/Bu4预处理方案中联合400 cGy TBI虽可降低复发风险,但因方案相关死亡率升高,未能改善总生存率。临床试验注册号:NCT01366612。

 

原文链接:

Prospective, Randomized, Comparative Study of Myeloablative Fludarabine/Busulfan and Fludarabine/Busulfan/Total Body Irradiation Conditioning in Myeloid Diseases

广告
广告加载中...