肿瘤(癌症)患者之家
首页
癌症知识
肿瘤中医药治疗
肿瘤药膳
肿瘤治疗技术
前沿资讯
临床试验招募
登录/注册
VIP特权
广告
广告加载中...

文章:

比较R-苯达莫司汀与R-CHOP联合维持疗法作为滤泡性淋巴瘤一线系统治疗的疗效:一项GELTAMO多中心回顾性研究

Comparing R-Bendamustine vs. R-CHOP Plus Maintenance Therapy as First-Line Systemic Treatment in Follicular Lymphoma: A Multicenter Retrospective GELTAMO Study

原文发布日期:26 March 2024

DOI: 10.3390/cancers16071285

类型: Article

开放获取: 是

 

英文摘要:

Rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) and R-bendamustine (R-B) are the most common frontline treatment strategies for advanced-stage follicular lymphoma (FL). After R-CHOP induction therapy, using rituximab for maintenance therapy notably improves outcomes; however, whether this can be achieved by using the same approach after R-B therapy is still being determined. This retrospective analysis compared 476 FL patients from 17 GELTAMO centers who received R-based regimens followed by rituximab maintenance therapy for untreated advanced-stage FL. The complete response rate at the end of induction was higher with R-B and relapses were more frequent with R-CHOP. During induction, cytopenias were significantly more frequent with R-CHOP and so was the use of colony-stimulating factors. During maintenance therapy, R-B showed more neutropenia and infectious toxicity. After a median follow-up of 81 months (95% CI: 77–86), the 6-year rates of progression-free survival (PFS) were 79% (95% CI: 72–86) for R-bendamustine vs. 67% (95% CI: 61–73) for R-CHOP (p= 0.046), and 6-year overall survival (OS) values were 91% (95% CI: 86–96) for R-B vs. 91% (95% CI: 87–94) for R-CHOP (p= 0.49). In conclusion, R-B followed by rituximab maintenance therapy in patients with previously untreated FL resulted in significantly longer PFS than R-CHOP, with older patients also benefiting from this treatment without further toxicity. Adverse events during maintenance were more frequent with R-B without impacting mortality.

 

摘要翻译: 

利妥昔单抗、环磷酰胺、多柔比星、长春新碱和泼尼松(R-CHOP)以及利妥昔单抗联合苯达莫司汀(R-B)是晚期滤泡性淋巴瘤(FL)最常用的一线治疗策略。在R-CHOP诱导治疗后,使用利妥昔单抗进行维持治疗可显著改善预后;然而,在R-B治疗后采用相同方法是否也能达到这一效果,目前仍在探索中。本回顾性分析比较了来自17个GELTAMO中心的476例未经治疗的晚期FL患者,这些患者接受了以利妥昔单抗为基础的方案诱导治疗后,继以利妥昔单抗维持治疗。诱导治疗结束时的完全缓解率在R-B组更高,而R-CHOP组的复发更为频繁。在诱导治疗期间,R-CHOP组血细胞减少的发生率显著更高,集落刺激因子的使用也更为常见。在维持治疗期间,R-B组表现出更多的中性粒细胞减少和感染性毒性。中位随访81个月(95% CI:77-86)后,R-B组的6年无进展生存率(PFS)为79%(95% CI:72-86),而R-CHOP组为67%(95% CI:61-73)(p=0.046);6年总生存率(OS)在R-B组为91%(95% CI:86-96),R-CHOP组为91%(95% CI:87-94)(p=0.49)。总之,在既往未经治疗的FL患者中,R-B继以利妥昔单抗维持治疗相较于R-CHOP方案,能显著延长PFS,且老年患者也能从该治疗中获益而未增加额外毒性。维持治疗期间的不良事件在R-B组更为常见,但未影响死亡率。

 

原文链接:

Comparing R-Bendamustine vs. R-CHOP Plus Maintenance Therapy as First-Line Systemic Treatment in Follicular Lymphoma: A Multicenter Retrospective GELTAMO Study

广告
广告加载中...