肿瘤(癌症)患者之家
首页
癌症知识
肿瘤中医药治疗
肿瘤药膳
肿瘤治疗技术
前沿资讯
临床试验招募
登录/注册
VIP特权
广告
广告加载中...

文章:

系统性淋巴结清扫在低级别浆液性卵巢癌中的作用:一项系统综述与荟萃分析

The Role of Systematic Lymphadenectomy in Low-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

原文发布日期:27 February 2024

DOI: 10.3390/cancers16050955

类型: Article

开放获取: 是

 

英文摘要:

Objective: To evaluate the role of systematic lymphadenectomy in low-grade serous ovarian cancer (LGSOC) and determine its impact on clinical outcomes in overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) terms. Methods: A comprehensive, systematic computer literature search on PubMed was performed using the following Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms: “low grade serous ovarian cancer” AND/OR “lymphadenectomy” AND/OR “staging” AND/OR “ovarian cancer” AND/OR “cytoreduction”. Separate searches were performed with MeSH terms on MEDLINE and EMBASE to extract all the relevant literature available. We included only patients with histologically confirmed LGSOC. Results: Three studies were considered in the quantitative analysis. Systematic lymphadenectomy in LGSOC failed to provide a significant OS or PFS benefit in LGSOC when compared to no lymphadenectomy in the entire (all the stages) population (for OS: HR = 1.15, 95% CI [0.42, 3.18] I2 = 84% and for PFS: HR = 1.46, 95% CI [0.63, 3.41], I2 = 71%), nor did it in the subtype analysis regarding FIGO stages. For FIGO early-stage I-II LGSOC, the DFS data were pooled (HR = 1.48, 95% CI [0.58, 3.78], I2 = 75%). In patients with advanced-stage (FIGO II–IV), we also failed to prove survival benefit for lymphadenectomy in OS (HR = 1.74, 95% CI [0.87, 3.48], I2 = 11%) or DFS (HR = 1.48, 95% CI [0.58, 3.78], I2 = 75%) compared to no lymphadenectomy. Conclusion: More extensive prospective research is mandatory to understand the real impact of lymphadenectomy on survival in LGSOC. The existing literature does not provide strong evidence.

 

摘要翻译: 

目的:评估系统性淋巴结切除术在低级别浆液性卵巢癌(LGSOC)中的作用,并确定其对总生存期(OS)和无病生存期(DFS)的临床影响。方法:在PubMed数据库中使用以下医学主题词(MeSH)进行系统性计算机文献检索:“低级别浆液性卵巢癌”和/或“淋巴结切除术”和/或“分期”和/或“卵巢癌”和/或“肿瘤细胞减灭术”。同时在MEDLINE和EMBASE数据库中使用MeSH词进行独立检索,以提取所有相关文献。仅纳入经组织学确诊的LGSOC患者。结果:定量分析共纳入三项研究。在全体(所有分期)LGSOC患者中,与未行淋巴结切除术相比,系统性淋巴结切除术未能显著改善OS或PFS(OS:HR=1.15,95% CI [0.42, 3.18],I2=84%;PFS:HR=1.46,95% CI [0.63, 3.41],I2=71%)。针对FIGO分期的亚组分析也未显示生存获益。在FIGO I-II期早期LGSOC患者中,合并DFS数据显示无显著差异(HR=1.48,95% CI [0.58, 3.78],I2=75%)。在晚期(FIGO II-IV期)患者中,与未行淋巴结切除术相比,淋巴结切除术同样未显示出OS(HR=1.74,95% CI [0.87, 3.48],I2=11%)或DFS(HR=1.48,95% CI [0.58, 3.78],I2=75%)的生存获益。结论:需要更广泛的前瞻性研究以明确淋巴结切除术对LGSOC患者生存的真实影响。现有文献未能提供有力证据。

 

原文链接:

The Role of Systematic Lymphadenectomy in Low-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

广告
广告加载中...