MRI is the gold standard for treatment response assessments for glioblastoma. However, there is no consensus regarding the optimal interval for MRI follow-up during standard treatment. Moreover, a reliable assessment of treatment response is hindered by the occurrence of pseudoprogression. It is unknown if a radiological follow-up strategy at 2–3 month intervals actually benefits patients and how it influences clinical decision making about the continuation or discontinuation of treatment. This study assessed the consequences of scheduled follow-up scans post-chemoradiotherapy (post-CCRT), after three cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy [TMZ3/6], and after the completion of treatment [TMZ6/6]), and of unscheduled scans on treatment decisions during standard concomitant and adjuvant treatment in glioblastoma patients. Additionally, we evaluated how often follow-up scans resulted in diagnostic uncertainty (tumor progression versus pseudoprogression), and whether perfusion MRI improved clinical decision making. Scheduled follow-up scans during standard treatment in glioblastoma patients rarely resulted in an early termination of treatment (2.3% post-CCRT, 3.2% TMZ3/6, and 7.8% TMZ6/6), but introduced diagnostic uncertainty in 27.7% of cases. Unscheduled scans resulted in more major treatment consequences (30%;p< 0.001). Perfusion MRI caused less diagnostic uncertainty (p= 0.021) but did not influence treatment consequences (p= 0.871). This study does not support the current pragmatic follow-up strategy and suggests a more tailored follow-up approach.
MRI是胶质母细胞瘤治疗反应评估的金标准。然而,在标准治疗期间进行MRI随访的最佳时间间隔尚未达成共识。此外,假性进展的出现阻碍了对治疗反应的可靠评估。目前尚不清楚每2-3个月进行一次影像学随访的策略是否真正使患者受益,以及它如何影响关于继续或停止治疗的临床决策。本研究评估了在胶质母细胞瘤患者标准同步放化疗及辅助治疗期间,按计划进行的随访扫描(放化疗后、辅助化疗三个周期后[TMZ3/6]以及治疗完成后[TMZ6/6])以及非计划扫描对治疗决策的影响。此外,我们评估了随访扫描导致诊断不确定性(肿瘤进展与假性进展)的频率,以及灌注MRI是否改善了临床决策。在胶质母细胞瘤患者标准治疗期间,按计划进行的随访扫描很少导致早期终止治疗(放化疗后为2.3%,TMZ3/6为3.2%,TMZ6/6为7.8%),但在27.7%的病例中引入了诊断不确定性。非计划扫描导致更多重大治疗后果(30%;p<0.001)。灌注MRI减少了诊断不确定性(p=0.021),但未影响治疗后果(p=0.871)。本研究不支持当前实用的随访策略,并建议采用更具个体化的随访方法。