Some cytogenetic abnormalities (CAs) are associated with poorer prognosis in multiple myeloma (MM); proteasome inhibitors appear to benefit patients with high-risk CAs. We evaluated 2247 MM patients from the TOURMALINE-MM1/-MM2/-MM3/-MM4 trials to assess the PFS benefit of ixazomib plus lenalidomide-dexamethasone (Rd) vs placebo-Rd (TOURMALINE-MM1/-MM2) or ixazomib vs placebo (TOURMALINE-MM3/-MM4) in specific high-risk CAs. After a pooled median follow-up of 25.6 months, the hazard ratio (HR) for PFS with ixazomib- vs placebo-based therapy for high-risk patients was 0.74 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.59–0.93; median PFS [mPFS] 17.8 vs 13.2 months), and 0.70 (95% CI: 0.62–0.80; mPFS 26.3 vs 17.6 months) for complementary standard-risk patients. The HR for expanded high-risk patients was 0.75 (95% CI: 0.64–0.87; mPFS 18.1 vs 14.1 months), and 0.71 (95% CI: 0.59–0.85; mPFS 36.1 vs 21.4 months) for complementary standard-risk patients. The HR for PFS with ixazomib- vs placebo-based therapy was 0.68 in patients with t(4;14) (95% CI: 0.48–0.96; mPFS 22.4 vs 13.2 months), and 0.77 for patients with amp1q21 (95% CI: 0.63–0.93; mPFS 18.8 vs 14.5 months). A PFS benefit was demonstrated with ixazomib- vs placebo-based therapy regardless of cytogenetic status, with greatest benefit observed in patients with t(4;14) and amp1q21.
某些细胞遗传学异常(CAs)与多发性骨髓瘤(MM)的不良预后相关;蛋白酶体抑制剂似乎对高危CAs患者有益。我们评估了来自TOURMALINE-MM1/-MM2/-MM3/-MM4试验的2247例MM患者,以评估伊沙佐米联合来那度胺-地塞米松(Rd)对比安慰剂-Rd(TOURMALINE-MM1/-MM2)或伊沙佐米对比安慰剂(TOURMALINE-MM3/-MM4)在特定高危CAs中对无进展生存期(PFS)的益处。经过中位25.6个月的汇总随访后,高危患者接受基于伊沙佐米的治疗对比基于安慰剂的治疗的PFS风险比(HR)为0.74(95%置信区间[CI]:0.59–0.93;中位PFS为17.8个月对比13.2个月),而互补性标危患者为0.70(95% CI:0.62–0.80;中位PFS为26.3个月对比17.6个月)。扩展高危患者的HR为0.75(95% CI:0.64–0.87;中位PFS为18.1个月对比14.1个月),而互补性标危患者为0.71(95% CI:0.59–0.85;中位PFS为36.1个月对比21.4个月)。对于携带t(4;14)的患者,基于伊沙佐米的治疗对比基于安慰剂的治疗的PFS HR为0.68(95% CI:0.48–0.96;中位PFS为22.4个月对比13.2个月);对于amp1q21患者为0.77(95% CI:0.63–0.93;中位PFS为18.8个月对比14.5个月)。无论细胞遗传学状态如何,基于伊沙佐米的治疗均显示出PFS获益,其中在携带t(4;14)和amp1q21的患者中观察到最大获益。